Showing posts with label Evil HR Lady. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Evil HR Lady. Show all posts

Monday, 28 March 2011

Safe at Home

 My latest post is a little different this week in that the subject matter has been inspired by the Carnival of HR that some of you might be aware of by the sterling work that Evil HR Lady and her HR Minion do on behalf of it.



For the current carnival HR bloggers were given a suggested post title and were then asked to come up with something, the title this time being ‘Safe at Home’. Below is what came to mind for me – hope you enjoy!


(NB Want to find more details out about the Carnival of HR, Evil HR Lady and HR Minion? Find them on Twitter for more useful HR debate, insight and just all round good stuff: @HR_Minion @realevilhrlady)

The post title immediately made me think of a Question of Sport. For those not in the UK it is a long running quiz show with the following format: two teams of sports (retired, current or otherwise) personalities (“personalities”) compete answering a variety of questions , guessing who the mystery star is in one round, working out anagrams of other athletes names, and so on.


One segment of the show allows for the contestants to answer questions that are dubbed either ‘Home’ or ‘Away’ – Home being the sport that they compete in, Away of one which they did not with their being double points on offer for those who answered the later correctly.


I think there is sometimes a danger as HR professionals that we play it ‘Safe at Home’ in a variety of ways. One in particular (which I have been guilty of) is when we might not be on site with our client groups/departments, so just fall back on emails rather than a phone call or visiting – the irony being although it allows for quick communication it can arguably be misinterpreted more easily by the person receiving it.


This is staying at home, playing it safe. Ever wonder if you are doing enough playing away and doubling up on your points with your contacts from a professional relationship prospective?


How about trying this next time you know you might have to deal with an awkward customer or client – rather than emailing, phone to say ‘Hey I thought about emailing but thought it might be great to catch up – whats going on with you guys? Is there a time you would be free to meet?’


Some might get edgy at first – if there was no reason to meet, the first question might be what have I done for you to want to meet? This might lead to a legion of unprompted confessions such as ‘is it related to the stapler and post its I took home last Tuesday? You gotta believe me when I say that was an accident and I will return it damn it!”


Ok, maybe not that but you will probably be asked why. Explain you want to build bridges and get to know their needs better – you never know, you might pre-empt some sort of problem they had been storing up but could not think of the correct opportunity to approach you with it.


Alternatively nothing of interest might come up - but what you have you got to lose from making the first move and building up a connection


So next time you are about to send out an email, stop and think could I call or arrange to meet this person - you might find you double up on points for playing away and not sticking to the safe bet at home.



Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 23 August 2010

Always look on the bright side of life

If you had one of those days recently (as I certainly have!) just think, it could be worse - at least you are not risking your life earning a living.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 26 July 2010

Problems of the finance worlds culture club (or lack thereof)

Reading Andrew Ross Sorkin's 'Too Big to Fail' recently, it reminded me how close the global economy seemingly came to spinning of its axis.

Yet despite his worrying (and entertaining) account of what happened Sorkin was recently suggesting that there might be a danger of too much regulation being placed on those in the financial sector.

Aside from market constraints, the issues of regulation in reward is one of interest to HR practitioners - specifically, what was its roles in trying to fight/inadvertedly supporting the circumstances in which individuals and organisations were encouraged to take on such risk? As well as this, what should be the lessons that are applied in the future to avoid such a culture being fostered?

It should be mentioned that I have no experiece of working in a HR function in the financial services and from the outside looking in, it seems a catch 22 - fight the culture and you are in danger of falling behind more willing comepetitors and disenfranchise shareholders; allow the status quo to continue and there is the danger you allow circumstances to return back to the financial tsunami which we are still clawing our way back from.

Arguably it all comes down to values - what is the purpose of your role in an organisation and what are the principles which you need to apply day to day to what you do. Easier said than done no doubt and it might be argued that to think suich a mindset is possible in the sector and it is naive to think so.

However, there were some that managed to keep their head above water during the crisis. Referring to Sorkin's book again, my favourite segment was reading how staff at Lehman Brothers applauded members of senior management at one point when they were able to sell of elements of the business to Barclays, saving thousands of jobs in the process.

Sounds like it could have been the TUPE from hell! What would have been interesing to hear is whether there was some form of induction for those staff taken under the Barclays wing to perhaps address any differences in corporate culture, approaches to risk and deals, etc.

The issue of culture - so hard to pind down how it is specically created -  is something that was suggested as being more of a problem than the actual remuneration issues, as suggested by People Management in 2009.

But how do you battle organisational culture which requires some risk, when its comeptitors have no problem with doing so? Answers on a postcard to messrs Obama, Cameron, et al.

In the meantime here is what the Telegraph's guide to how the EU is responding.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, 19 March 2010

Something for the weekend...

According to a famous song it is a mans, mans, mans world- but does it have to be this way? If not, what can be done about it?

Evil HR Lady always has some interesting ideas on HR in general and has some suggestions on how this status quo can be challenged at BNET.

Also, an interesting article at INC - Joel Spolsky provides a cautionary tale for all blogs, this one included...